...and regarding the subject line, Ethan, I can certainly say the same, since your frequent repeating of the same arguments and rhetoric over and over again, which have been refuted through the years over and over again, are only a challenge in the sense they require a lot of typing to respond to. But not to refute!

You change the subject at will and deny plain reality.

By the first part of your claim, that means I take the subject in a direction that you dislike.

By the second part of the claim, that means I deny and refute the reality that you want to exist, which is a world where there is little censorship on this topic, but merely youths who care nothing for their rights; where men are so likely to be evil that they always have to be pre-emptively treated as such with biased, draconian laws that pretty much ignore due process and the staple of innocent until proven guilty (or at least some evidence thereof); and where so many girls and women are innocent and in need of protection, all must be pre-emptively treated as such with a combination of Nanny State and SJW-style prohibitions and entitlements, respectively. Sorry, Ethan, but I deny that reality because we do not actually live in it, as readily empirical evidence makes clear.

You plug in one of your cassette tapes (as the old saying might go) and say something that's sort of related to the subject at hand, at great length.

To carry your metaphor further, you mean I plug in a cassette tape containing music of a genre you dislike (I see you as a country music person for some reason, or possibly a fan of Laurence Welk, which is why you dislike my hip hop tapes), but are stuck listening to because you're speaking in a house which is one of the very few places where you and your mates lack control over the cassette player and what type of music can be played in it.

You respond to all my points, you get my responses in return. A literary version of "an eye for an eye," I guess. But eye-opening, rather than eye-piercing, for those who have an interest in seeing all sides to the issue, a rare opportunity. But still more common than you'd like, I reckon.

That's the way it is in all your other replies to me in this round. It's a step above Monty Python's "argument" sketch, but not much:

Hey, I love Monty Python! They make some very salient points about society that people dislike hearing, so they hide it behind comedy. I'm not a good comedian, so I go to the truth directly. Nevertheless, you put me in some good company here, Ethan. Keep doing that, and I'm gonna end up liking you! :-D

And wow, does your link here suggest we have something in common? Me and you??!! Next I'm gonna find out you're also a Pokemon fan! Since you're the one who tends to pick the arguments here, perhaps everyone on the board should take a cue from that guy in the video and start charging you several pounds and six pence for each one!