GirlChat #724264

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  


Posted by summerdays on Thursday, May 10 2018 at 3:00:08PM
In reply to Danny Whittaker's exchange w/ Tom O'Carroll Part 1 posted by Dissident on Friday, April 27 2018 at 10:30:26AM

Definitely agree. Focusing on the choice of using "it" as a pronoun in order to allegedly expose some underlying belief in human beings as inanimate objects is a low blow indeed. It's seeing patterns where they don't exist. If you already have suspicions about a group of people, you're going to have an interpretation bias.

I have never heard an argument for the "objectification" model that was based in any form of reality, as opposed to sex-negative delusion. And I've heard a lot.

There is, perhaps, the occasional Ed Gein, who literally sees people as unthinking, unfeeling, disposable tools for his personal enjoyment, but this is an extreme (and thankfully rare) pathology, and it is not fair to extrapolate it in any meaningful way to the standard model of sexual dynamics.


Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)

Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?