...antis frequently bring up concerns that are very much beside the point of the topics they address, and which betray a complete ignorance on the actual dynamics of adult attraction to youths. In place of actual knowledge is always a set of blanket assumptions that bear little resemblance to reality. These assumptions are all part of a system of beliefs that rationalize the ignorance and bigotry, and support a narrative that exists only in the minds of the people that promote it.
If you cannot argue from the standpoint of demonstrable evidence, then what does that say about your entire point of view? Antis' arguments are mostly fueled by popularity and emotional appeal, but have little foundation in objective reality.
Thank you--and the rest of the group here--for keeping the pro-choice side of the debate going strong during my latest absence. I don't seem to see Eeyore around anywhere, though.