If it were legal for pedophiles to have sex with children and minors, then many children/minors would be harmed but pedos don't care anything about these children or minors.

Whenever one brings up real harm to real children, pedophiles like to say something with a qualifier such as "usually", "most of the time, etc. to insist that SOME children will escape the dire consequences that having sexual activity with pedophiles would entail.

As everyone here knows:

Regarding this post and every post I write about myself describing my past, be advised that I was tried, convicted, sentenced to a very long time in prison, and I served the complete sentence. Be further advised that I am no longer practicing illegal activities today and that I refrain from doing so by my own choice, not from fear of legal entanglements or society's outrage. I remain crime free because I choose to.

Okay, now to address your statement.

I cannot say, for certain, what the statistics are regarding adult/minor sexual encounters. I can say, for certain, things I know from the first hand experiences with people I have been involved with. There are quite a few since, in my lengthy sojourn on this planet, I have spoken with many people about a great many subjects. Sex is one of those subjects. Because I know things that you do not, I can say (without giving out any identifying information) that little girls have, in the past, do now, and will do in the future, enjoy sexual relations with an adult. This information is not from research papers, news articles, or "a friend of a friend told my neighbor who told me..." My information comes from people who discussed their past sexual encounters with me, personally. And, then, there was me and my little lover.

She and I were having sexual encounters from when She was 6 until She was 10, whereupon, as noted above, I was sentenced to prison for it. For the first two years of my sentence, She would write me, speak with me via phone, and even got to visit me several times. Events would have it that She was taken to a psychologist/counselor simply because She had been my "victim" (their words, not Hers nor mine.) That set the stage for Her suddenly "realizing" that She had been a victim. Billi, She loved me. (Even the other people who have discussed their intergenerational sexual encounters said the same thing.) The girls were in love. Yet Society changed that simply because Society declared all little girl/adult sex to be harmful. Later, my little lover disowned me. (Quite a change, eh?)

Again, while I was only involved with one little lover, there are other girls (now adults) that have spoken to me (I won't get into how or what the circumstances were) about their love.

Yes, there are people like the thing that raped a 9 year old little girl from Woodstock, Ontario (here in Canada) in 2009 then directed its girlfriend to kill the child. But, of the hundreds of millions of child lovers similar to me, do you think they ALL would hurt their lovers? No. Only about one half of 1% might rape and/or kill but the relationship can hardly be called one of love. And it's just NOT common. It's extremely rare. That's what your problem is with the statistics, billi. You are putting ME in the same box that the rapist is in.

Perhaps you would consider the pleasurable sexual encounters my little lover and I were having to be defined as rape? I would not. Rape is a violent, painful, distressful event for the victim. A perpetrator of such a violent crime should be exterminated. Do you think that I should be exterminated for my kisses?