Upon clicking, I can only see 3 pics. Apparently the others have been removed.

The pic of a girl in a car's driving seat, smoking a cigarette, looks to me like a study on girls attempting to grow up. While it's intentionally costumed and posed in a way that intends to make her appear to be trying to look older; it's very much like the pics (and videos) girls themselves post on social media or the ways they act to look older. I don't see any specific attempt to make her sexier, more attractive or more appealing. (You may or may not like the attitude, but that's a different matter)

The pic of two teen girls (not children) embracing, looks to me very clearly like a study on the sexual self discovery of girls, particularly so lesbian / bisexual girls. It is sexual because it has to be sexual (or it wouldn't project lesbianism) but it does attempt to not be pornographic. A hug and embrace, with obvious primary and secondary sexual parts both covered and not interacted with, is as little sexual as you can get while still showing attraction between the models. I find it sexy because sexuality is sexy; but it clearly intends to be more sweet than pornographic.

The pic of the girl in boy underwear appearing to have a pot joint in her hand is also very clear to me. The girl is either being pimped out for the parents' drug habit, or prostituting herself for her own drug habit, or abandoned / runaway / throwaway and recurring to drugs and prostitution for survival. Either way it's a social protest, not a glorification, of streets (possibly homelessness), drugs and (socioeconomically induced) prostitution.

Truly pronz is in the eye of the beholder. And this ain't it.

I don't have money now. But I'd certainly buy her some prints. She is good. (And if I may say so, with similar artistic interests and visions as mine).