https://www.thestar.com/news/world/clothesonyourback/2013/10/11/i_got_hired_at_a_bangladesh_sweatshop_meet_my_9yearold_boss.html

There you go. Can you imagine people talking about how "children" are stupid and unimportant... while they're your boss at work and teaching you how to do your job?

It doesn't have to be one's boss; peerage determines one's social sphere in a class-stratified society, and customer service positions also adjust the assumed classes of persons as opposed to unpersons.

Having a ready source of income, especially when stripped of runaway, harboring, and other laws and ageist barriers, can do wonders for domestic violence. But in the end, it's the psychological and interpersonal effects of the absence of social cleansing that are, in fact, the main reason I need child labor - and truth be told, being a useless unperson and a "hungry mouth" has a huge impact as a root of domestic violence as well. It would certainly be a step up over, say, runaway trafficking.

The US state of Utah has support for child-owned business, and there is a chance this could be expanded. Almost nothing in the anglosphere allows for actual child workers, though, which creates a form of compelled political speech about, in the end, the literal human worth of the persons so excluded from self-representation - although, the "family business" model does allow for a bit more.

I need child labor so my neighbors can realize that their boss is better at their job than them. That's it. I'd like to thank the media creators that are using alternative methods to work around the damage done by compelled political speech.

I suggest that one of the most important steps is to make this happen.