GirlChat #727647
A bit about me, if it helps
Posted by ianvmcphail on 2018-December-16 16:11:52 EST, Sunday
In reply to You need to read the previous threads posted by sans on 2018-December-13 18:13:50 EST, Thursday
Views: 3 Likes: 0
Your criticisms are reasonable. A lot of my research has been with forensic samples, men who have been convicted of sexual offences. I continue to do this work to some extent, though my focus is shifting to general sex research. And forensic research does treat all sexual contact with children as sexual abuse. There are drawbacks in this kind of approach, especially from some of the perspectives here on GC and elsewhere. To the extent that people here see this approach as stigmatizing adult-child sexual contact, I would be guilty of this.
However, my approach to and understanding of pedophilia and minor attraction is not totalized by the forensic perspective. General human sexuality and developmental perspectives are generally those that I view minor attraction through; though in the past, I may have been influenced by a forensic perspective more than recently. And more generally, humanism and compassion run through most of what I do, which I *hope* makes me a better researcher.
Here are some recent-ish blog posts I've done that might be of interest (wordpress likely tracks IP addresses and uses JavaScript):
https://nextgenforensic.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/disclosing-a-sexual-interest-in-children-to-others-the-experience-of-a-non-offending-pedophile/
https://nextgenforensic.wordpress.com/2016/01/10/stigma-and-non-offending-pedophiles/
And then one from my colleagues that might interest:
https://nextgenforensic.wordpress.com/2017/03/26/challenging-societal-negativity-towards-paedophiles/
Ian.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Not really - manbot on 2018-December-18 10:04:36 EST, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- ian! - hieronymus on 2018-December-29 04:25:12 EST, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- hieronymus - ianvmcphail on 2018-December-31 15:00:21 EST, Monday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- ian! - hieronymus on 2018-December-29 04:25:12 EST, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Not as an approach but as a frame of mind - sans on 2018-December-17 19:52:42 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Not as an approach but as a frame of mind - ianvmcphail on 2018-December-19 15:41:46 EST, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 3)
- I don't know of another chain of reasoning that... - sans on 2018-December-19 17:52:40 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- In theory, theory and practice are the same - Baldur on 2018-December-19 15:55:27 EST, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- True - ianvmcphail on 2018-December-19 16:01:03 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Not as an approach but as a frame of mind - ianvmcphail on 2018-December-19 15:41:46 EST, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 3)
- Don't give up. - Eeyore on 2018-December-16 18:52:50 EST, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 6)
- Thanks, Eeyore - ianvmcphail on 2018-December-19 15:43:41 EST, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Well said, Eeyore - nt - Cangee on 2018-December-16 20:33:04 EST, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- merry whatever you believe, Cangee:) - Eeyore on 2018-December-17 01:19:58 EST, Monday - (5 / 0 / 1)
- Merry...comet Wirtanen perigee? -nt - Cangee on 2018-December-17 04:48:03 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- merry whatever you believe, Cangee:) - Eeyore on 2018-December-17 01:19:58 EST, Monday - (5 / 0 / 1)
- Seconded -- nmt - Hajduk on 2018-December-16 19:35:25 EST, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- thank you, Hajduk (nt) - Eeyore on 2018-December-17 01:23:34 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)