Yes, you are right. There are some snippets that make sense. I had to cheat a little here and there to make the grammar come out right. Of course, there probably are many spots where grammar failed a bit because I didn't read it all for accuracy.
You have got to be one helluva smart guy to catch those pieces that apply. Normally, people are "supposed" to think, "what the hell is all that?" and give up.
Anyway, no. there is no real meaningful discourse in totality. It's just gibberish. But, so too, keep in mind that my methodology was focused on creating something that a cursory glance might... might... pass the Turing. I know, for a fact, it did pass a college TA's cursory glance. :D
Now, for your case study: prove that this response to your post was either by a human or by a machine. (15 extra credit points on your final grade.)