For me, I must (because I have a lengthy and colourful past) refrain from any more involvement even remotely remote to an involvement with a little girl. This is by my own set of rules that I have placed upon myself. Because I put them there, I am very good at obeying them. (Not that I want to, but because I want to. Paradox, don't you think?)
Since you are new and have very little idea of just what kind of pedo I am, I shall give my usual post disclaimer:
Regarding this post and every post I write about myself describing my past, be advised that I was tried, convicted, sentenced to a very long time in prison, and I served the complete sentence. Be further advised that I am no longer practicing illegal activities today and that I refrain from doing so by my own choice, not from fear of legal entanglements or society's outrage. I remain crime free because I choose to.
There are a lot of reasons for my set of rules for the Gimwinkle me. First, and foremost, it's because my "pedo meter" is past the redline. All a little girl need do is... well... anyway, She can control me but good (as several have done so in my past). Today, not only would I gladly break my own rules, society's rules, and Robert's Rules of Order which would be in poor parliamentary form, certainly poor legal form, and definitely in poor obedience to my own strictures pursuant to my desires to protect little girls from societal interference and/or brain washing, (I'm getting paid extra for lengthier grammar constructs!) but if it were socially possible, I would be the first person on Earth to fall in love with a little girl... to have, to hold, from this day forward, till death do us part or till She outgrows a need for me.
Would I be unfaithful to Her? No. I would be in so much love for Her that I would never waiver in my fidelity to Her. Would I still lust after some other little girl, should I see one (or more)? Of course. I am a pedo. I am hardwired to lust after them. Even today, as I am, I lust after them. I just remain... fidel?... to my set of rules and to my hypothetical little lover.
But, that's me. Even in my imagination, my imaginary lovers are "just you and me, kid." I don't even like photographs of my imaginary lovers with someone else in the picture. Like I said, that's me.
I know, especially here in (western) Canada, "poly gammy" occurs and I am certainly not averse to that. More power to the guy. Or, contrariwise, more power to the girl! Love is love. One plus one is still one, just as one infinity plus one infinity is still one infinity (to dabble in my hobby of mathematics).
But, for me, my programming... my hardwire... is for "one gammy". My involvement with a hypothetical little girl would be monogamous because of how I love... how I am capable of loving. I know not what course others may take (and they can take as many as they can), but as for me, give me... just one little lover.