therefore, a child molester.

just because it's monetized (the girl's tiny livelihood in exchange for ownership) doesn't make it instantly okay. particularly under those conditions. the whole scenario is very unfortunate. no one should be forced into prostitution, but this here's straight-up exploitation of the child as a resource. even though the "customer" is not responsible for the child's situation directly, they're still participating in her rape. don't ignore it.

~ loom