...and I saw... child abuse!

It really is basically universal and homogenous. The answer to a child's screaming, crying, or asking you to stop, including for something you did to them, was usually to hit it or berate and threaten it or, sometimes, to keep shoving it, not really caring if it falls along sharpened asphault, while looking at other things. While it cries.

Unsurprisingly, heat exhaustion, dehydration, and similar medical issues were abundantly on display. Altitude is one of the better ones - if you've already got a headache going up the mountain, you're probably going to die of kidney failure if you keep going up the mountain.

It's honestly more humane that way.

Which brings us to our basic problem : if we won today, this is the world we would wake up to. And it wouldn't last; hurting children is the fundamental basis of this shit-tier excuse for a civilization, and how people handle their emotions.

Studies show we're not very conducive to that - so how do you think that's going to go?

There's a poster over on BC, desmond prince, who correctly deducced that nobody is going to even pretend to be a nonpathological person (specifically, trying to hurt others at zero reward or less in game theory) until a lot of them are dead. This is accurate, the last 50 years for instance is a pretty solid data pool on "all other methods, including hoping that even minimal human decency is somewhere." The data is in. It's not.

The awesome thing about this is that it allows for taking note of nicks. You can see the cheapest ploys at fake discouragement or dissuasion of actually-effective-means, with absolutely no meat. No alternate methods, no working solutions... mostly derailment and bullshit, pulled off cheaply.

He wanted to subvert governments. I just hooked him up with a standard science pack. Win, and maybe I'll stop trying to kill you.

...and if we win today, this is the great, utopic world we wake up to.

There are, as most people know, several thousand missing children courtesy of the US government, and at least a few hundred to a few thousand murdered to forcibly drive them.

Trump defunded one known US federally-operated child trafficking organization...

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2018/03/14/trump-gutting-national-endowment-for-democracy-and-that-good-thing/fKxkRFVIC6F9wLIw4WsUzL/story.html

...possibly because of the embarassment of having to draft a bunch of bostonian kindergarteners and middle schoolers for defense. It apparently worked, btw, leading to the question of why, if one is old enough to be drafted to fight the NED and halt their wars of aggression against, among other things, why one cannot drink, smoke, and vote.

http://www.missingkids.com/footer/media/keyfacts

...but did not defund the other major sex trafficking org. Admittedly, while I read that as "92% child sex trafficking," some of it could be, you know, child-burning-trafficking.

One is often... ashamed... to participate in this world.

Ah well, texas. Two major factors come to mind. The first is that, publicly speaking, Texas fell through the Ft. Worth sherrif's office via oklahoma, directly after the terror attacks allegedly via oklahoma - planned parenthood shootings et al, and promptly scooped american vanguard by takeover and webjacking, mostly, leading to a few bombings at the behest of an offshore power, always fun...

But additionally...

https://web.archive.org/web/20140315194022/http://perverted-justice.com/

...PJ came back announcing a direct link to its sponsors in canada, which not only means they were a major front player in the north african embassy attacks and the attack on northern california, but it also pegs them to...

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-november-13-2018-1.4902679/indigenous-women-kept-from-seeing-their-newborn-babies-until-agreeing-to-sterilization-says-lawyer-1.4902693

Oh yeah. That. IIRC, the parent corporation was in Alberta or Saskatchewan at the time, but more interestingly, it's moved to the Washington (US) border, apparently to facilitate crime. Possibly recent crime.

As a result of this, if you're actually looking for the missing children, you'll ultimately want to go through every contact PJ or NBC ever had, before after or during.

https://www.texastribune.org/2018/10/05/federal-judge-texas-strikes-down-indian-child-welfare-act/

https://www.thenation.com/article/south-carolina-sought-exemption-allow-foster-care-agency-discriminate-non-christians/

...potentially, over a large area. And yes, that first one does count as "you were warned ahead of time." Plus, you know, the whole network itself would probably be good to investigate.

...aka "I'm posting to piss Red Violin off again." Some of them really do suck, what?

So, well... it's a fun sort of job,, and a lot of the parties range from open record to open advertising. Ever think of making fun of Nigeria, "your rape gangs are weak"-style? Well, we've got that, whether we want it or not.

Meanwhile, most folk at least know that the cops drag the runaways back. It's just what kind of good people are around you. Still think we should spare anything? Because that's what these people actually are. And aside from the concern trolls, your only problem is that you're not willing to buy, sell, and rape - anything else is just too soft and doesn't make America.

Fun, huh?

Personally, trying to find them is not on my "responsible use of energy" chart. Several thousand more people with a life like mine, maybe they'll show up at some moment with whatever uncontacted technological base you never bothered to talk to and, you know, kill fucking everyone, like the good kids with a sense of realism. But I think it's adorable, even good, if some people are.

That is a lot of person-to-person contact. But there it is. Meanwhile, you'd probably have to fce what's really going on to even bother to try.

If we win today, this world is still the world we wake up tomorrow. Fun, huh?