GirlChat #730405
It would still be irresponsible not to let the public know about the dangers of such diseases as are primarily sexually transmitted
I have good news : there are zero. shouldn't we be a bit cautious about abandoning solutions that mostly worked? ...but here's what I'm thanking you for. We have the old solutions-or-nonsolutions. As such, while the motivational schema will be truly individual, we can be assured that zero solutions will be worse than the old solutions (or nonsolutions). Guaranteed, universal improvement. Meanwhile... - if everyone is freely developing, one has thousands or millions or billions of solutions on thousands or millions or billions of topics that interest actual people. - if all is orchestrated by the great leader, you have the intellectual and creative power of one person, and the topics that interest their whim but get no direct feedback from, since others pay the price. - if we take the former case, but consider stasis as its own reward, we have... zero. Meanwhile, on this topic, there's an actual death toll. Are you going to claim those deaths, lor are you going to just keep demanding the same thing that caused them? Thanks for the perfect, public model of a saboteur, complete with disinformation, the-cause-is-the-solution, and appeal to vague, formless fear if one ceases sabotage activity. |