Sigh.

Common media has recently dug up some allegedly old remarks by the non-Nazi pope (Francis)...

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/lesterfeder/pope-compares-transgender-people-to-nuclear-weapons

https://www.ncronline.org/news/vatican/francis-strongly-criticizes-gender-theory-comparing-it-nuclear-arms

...and here I was, planning to, y'know, wait a little.

Naturally, the reporting is... severely distorted. Distorted enough, in fact, for maximum destruction and discord at the ground floor. That alone is enough to pretty much end the world; God, in a deist-agnostic sense, does not particularly respect internal narcissistic games of class - that is, dehumanization - and power, unlike, say, ease of life under a regime, comes from the ground floor.

So, umm... sure, NCR, go ahead and make sure it's more destructive and destroyed on the ground floor. Surely, that totally won't push the planet to the brink as one of your discarded classes (child, poor, otherwise sidelined - saaay, wasn't most of the red-letter stuff in the new testament largely about this?) just kind of says "fuck it"...

...it's a broad media habit. And one ranging from "useless" to the more-realistic "completely fucking dangerous," actually. Meanwhile, the idea of finding signal where the wasteland ends tends to completely ignore both the possibility that it is the cause of the wasteland... and the amount of sheer fucking abuse and its plausible effects. There probably are four lights; does it matter?

The quoted text...

" or of the gender theory, that does not recognize the order of creation."

...is astoundingly friendly to, well, everything. "Skirt or pants" has nothing to do with creation. Gender apartheid which does not relate in a profoundly narrow fashion to pregnancy, as in "half of you should probably wear a pair of shorts in the otherwise-nude one-bed sleepover," has nothing to do with creation. The notion that neurological gender and primary external physical gender do not form seperately in utero is directly against literally-observable creation.

...and at a world population of several billion - crap, woman, go ahead and hunt big game by yourself with melee weapons. Thinking they shouldn't be able to and know how disrespects creation when the world population was a few dozen for several thousand miles; the mathematical utility is not actually a thing which makes sense without a firm grounding in its source, and incompetence has zero utility.

For that matter, the gender issues of presumed males being named "Francis" has nothing to do with anything physically in creation.

So, there's basically nothing that could be friendlier that can be said. While I'm pretty sure it might not be catholic doctrine, a world population of billions presses pretty heavily on "every sperm is sacred" and "don't get a vasectomy" as well.

...buuuut maybe we should focus on destroying gender. It is, after all, what is explicitly stated.

What caused me to end my silence a bit earlier, however...

"The true custody of creation does not have anything to do with the ideologies that consider man like an accident, like a problem to eliminate."

This is a nice sentiment. It is not, strictly speaking, true.

This is the Ming wall.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Wall_of_China

This is the other Ming wall.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Fence_Act_of_2006

This is the forced settlement of the last unsettled populace.

https://www.kezi.com/content/news/Astoria-clears-homeless-camps-on-city-forestland-500306581.html

http://katu.com/news/local/portland-begins-clearing-homeless-camps-from-odot-property

https://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/2019/09/15/salem-oregon-homeless-camps-wallace-marine-park/2291946001/

https://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/2019/07/12/salem-city-council-again-considers-sit-lie-rule-limit-homeless-sidewalk-camping-oregon/1717765001/

Planetarily.

So, while the claim was...

"The true custody of creation does not have anything to do with the ideologies that consider man like an accident, like a problem to eliminate."

...one will find instead that most of the world's religions have some sort of rainbow bridge wherein if you fuck with it, the promise not to slaughter all human life is... off. (Grim-triggers by the gambler's ruin paradox, actually). If that concept is just a little too Jewish for you, well...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heimdallr

....we can get it for you in the religion where a dude gets stabbed with a spear and attached to a stick, too.

It's actually an astoundingly generous standard for burning human life off the planet with fire. It literally waits until the last actual humans are driven into the sea. I can think of little more meek and forgiving than this; it waits 'till the end to, y'know, end.

And then it understands its duty. Compromise, well... might have happened on the other coast, but that's not what happened.

(I blame salem, btw....

https://www.youthrights.org/issues/curfew/curfew-laws/

https://hslda.org/content/docs/nche/Issues/S/State_Daytime_Curfew.asp

...it and some town in Pennsylvania were the two "early adopters." This occurred in the Kansas-affected area, meaning you can literally kill any city employee in these areas for treason - "all persons born.")

Suffice to say, the pope is, literally, completely wrong. (Something I wasn't exactly planning on saying in a formal capacity in my lifetime, let alone in this religion). Instead of...

"The true custody of creation does not have anything to do with the ideologies that consider man like an accident, like a problem to eliminate."

...it's actually inherent in the religion you're claiming to be a religious leader in that, once it hits this point, humanity is, in fact, a problem to eliminate.

The rainbow and its promise are fallen. This is objective fact. There is nothing to spin here.

We're glad you had a good time, prepare to be raptured by a bright flash of light shortly, and the nonproblematic species of creation will hopefully continue.

You can read it in any language you like. You can read it in any religion you like. You and I both know that promise is gone.

Predates us by a bit, doesn't it?

Thanks, though. It's not going to change the outcome - it was decided long before us - but the absence of doing evil unto others is.... refreshing.