GirlChat #733763

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

wiki wiki

Posted by Eeyore on Sunday, March 22 2020 at 09:26:08AM
In reply to The stats aren't reliable evidence posted by girlzRprettiest on Sunday, March 15 2020 at 11:00:48PM

While most twin researchers acknowledge the EEA's falsehood, they nevertheless rely on logically fallacious arguments (e.g., circular reasoning, switching the burden of proof) to justify their continued reliance on it.

Please show me one or two examples of this so I can understand your assertion better.

Also, I see you obsessing about twin studies, and while it's clear you are extremely knowledgeable, you don't seem to not only be going against the grain on generally agreed genetic factors. You've never seen a pair of eyes roll backward into a fit of complete rage over mild to moderate disappointment.

You are intimating that I don't believe that an attempted suicide at age 10 probably has a longstanding secretive underlying "environmental" cause which was never addressed, along with a long list of other behaviors which suggest unresolved early traumatic experience.


Personally, I don't see a problem with prostitution or porn and am not sure why you grouped them in with things like gangs. Sex is a pleasurable activity

Sex is a pleasurable activity ..except when it isn't. When you are being used as a money-maker, at times in a genocidal sort of way, it is usually not. Same goes for porn. Gangs who engage in these forms of business, and gangs in general, are not a preferable norm to my personal standards. Your high intellect leaves me feeling perplexed by such a statement to the contrary.

I am not in an argumentative mood about fluidity at the moment, although I do see it as a politically "fauxgressive" motivation, to use your term. I will also turn it back on you when you say:

What I take issue with are non-democratically established or otherwise oppressive norms that are imposed upon the people sans their input or consent

I do indeed feel the same when I am pressured to use "preferred pronouns" at a place of employment, which go against my beliefs of nature, and for which I could quite possibly be reprimanded or fired for not obeying against my beliefs, be they personal, religious, or otherwise.

The norms they violate, being rooted in the gender construct, are oppressive, so more power to them.

I do not follow. I think you need to explain your personal beliefs about the positive or negative nature of gender construct according to your opinion.

This characterizes psychiatry as much as it does the stigma against pedophilia, which has its origins in a 13th century English royal edict and which has admitted of little reasonable, democratic, critical discussion since.

Similar to Daniel, this is a very bold assertion. Are you willing to demonstrate the history of how this edict came to be the rule of law down through the ages for western society? I think I might like to explore this particular idea.

Also, why do you not post with what I sense is your usual nic? Can others not handle taking all the potential flack with just their own 20-year file?








Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?