I've been laughing my ... ass off about this.

Fact is, he has legal precedents for everything he's pursuing. In fact, he could really screw over millions of people if he wanted to take this to the extremes for which there are precedents from similar legal cases, and combined all those precedents into one.

Yes, legally it's not child porn ... and yet it also could be. Certainly people have been convicted and done hard time for possession of far more innocuous pictures. Which is difficult because you can't get much more innocuous. Yet it has happened.

Maybe he's a loser drug addict completely because of his own bad choices he made in life ... but that's a common them among false accusers who claimed abuse and were able to succeed in court.

So what's new?

Other than the fact that the public has to consider that THEY might be guilty of the "crimes" for which they demanded draconian punishments of the "other", and has to consider that maybe the government and law enforcement and media have all been lying about the people they are putting in prison.