"It may be difficult to define love, but it's often obvious when love is not present."

- If you can't define love, how can you say when it is not present?
- And "obvious" to who?

"If someone only has a raw sexual interest in someone else, that is not love. If someone does not have a strong emotional bond with someone, that is not love."

- Maybe these things are in fact love for some people out there. And what's more is this: Where does your statement leave those who are incapable of having "strong emotional bonds" with others? Shall we just heave folks like that, into the landfill, and chalk them up to being not fully human or something? There are plenty of people who are incapable of having strong emotional bonds, with anyone at all for the matter. But they're people too. And if they feel love by having consensual sex (or any form of physical contact) from time to time (with even a complete stranger - who may also likely be the type incapable of having strong emotional bonds), then what's wrong with that? Are they less important than anyone else because of it? Do they deserve any less respect or rights? Etc.?