GirlChat #544990
So that's a Yes?
Posted by redcocoa101 on 2011-December-05 21:30:01 EST, Monday
In reply to Many possibilities posted by Strider@ThePub on 2011-December-05 21:04:30 EST, Monday
Obviously people don't fall in love and live happily ever after, but that is a goal for relationships isn't it? To find the person you want to be with forever.
I also think it's really rude of you to say that guys look for a girl young enough not to be 'ruined'. As if somehow meeting a certain age 'ruins' the girl if they aren't otherwise influenced. Doesn't really bode well if you view older girls as 'ruined' when the young girl you like is ultimately going to become a women that's 'ruined'.
How do you know it will be the girl breaking it off? What if they man no longer finds her attractive and decides to go look for someone in his age preferance. Are you saying that men just don't do that? It's always the girl who decides to break it off? I find that hard to believe. It's completely possible the girl will break it off, just like it's completely possible the man might break it off.
There is a lot of divorce, but those people go into the relationship at least looking for a life-long partner. I also think that couples as they get older aren't always totally attracted to their partners and stay with them because of personality. I was wondering if this is also the case with people attracted to certain ages. Will you stay with a woman when you really want to be with a girl.
I'm not throwing pedophiles in the role of villians I'm asking a legitimate question. If you were with a girl and she ages out of the range that you are attracted to, will you stay with her? How do you get past your lack of attraction if you do stay with her? If you know once she reaches a certain age her personality will not be what you're looking for is it fair to date her? From what I can tell you are saying yes you would stay with a girl even though you aren't attracted to them. Is that right?
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: So that's a Yes? - Dissident on 2011-December-06 23:20:20 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- 'Ruined' girls - Strider@ThePub on 2011-December-06 19:53:40 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: So that's a Yes? - qtns2di4 on 2011-December-06 03:48:17 EST, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 12)
- Re: So that's a Yes? - Markaba on 2011-December-06 07:18:20 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 11)
- Hardwired? - Dante on 2011-December-07 18:26:42 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 9)
- Re: Hardwired? - Markaba on 2011-December-07 22:47:06 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 6)
- 'Nevertheless' - Dante on 2011-December-08 20:01:37 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Hardwired? - qtns2di4 on 2011-December-08 17:58:56 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Hardwired? - Dissident on 2011-December-08 01:22:47 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- That really sucks - Hypersonic on 2011-December-07 18:56:57 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Re: That really sucks - Dante on 2011-December-07 19:38:37 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Hardwired? - Markaba on 2011-December-07 22:47:06 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 6)
- Re: So that's a Yes? - qtns2di4 on 2011-December-07 01:22:51 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Hardwired? - Dante on 2011-December-07 18:26:42 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 9)
- Re: So that's a Yes? - Markaba on 2011-December-06 07:18:20 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 11)
- Re: So that's a Yes? - zlurker on 2011-December-05 22:29:42 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- I still like your idea - Hypersonic on 2011-December-05 21:49:16 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 0)