I think more in terms of average emotional maturity, and an overall average increase in how relationships work among people, an increased ability to detect insincerity, etc.

It is possible to give classes of body language, instinctive face expressions, and the like, to children.

Then of course, every generation after would be actors and poker players...

But weighing more heavily in my thoughts these days is how abstaining from sex past a certain age (like 16 or 18) has a very high cost, as it's part of what makes life worth living. Abstaining before age 16 (and abstaining only with adult partners) is much less costly.

For that matter, why does it have to be sex with hoomins? Aren't sexbots good enough for everyone? (And never have a headache when you're horny)




You have been told countless times that cars and swimming pools are far more dangerous activities for children than sex is. So again, if more and less danger will constitute a criterion for deciding allowing an activity or not, then cars and swimming pools will be banned before sex.

I have also replied countless times that it is up to parents to make decisions about cars and swimming pools, and the benefits of cars and swimming pools are also widely thought to be much higher than the benefits of sex for kids (specifically sex with adults).

But again, you hypocritically apply for sex a standard you will not apply to cars and swimming pools.