Ok, I see your point

I understand the point that any anti reading this site probably copy/pastes Furby's posts to pur on their on websites to show how sick we are. I had not considered how his posts might look from an outsiders point-of-view because, really, I stopped caring what they think of us quite some time ago. The reason for this is simple. Yeah, it's easy for them (and some of us apparently) to look at Furby's panty-watching posts and call them sleaze. However, when you or I or anyone else here posts a beautiful loving GM about just being with a YF and holding her in our arms, well the antis are gonna copy/paste THAT and call it sleaze too! To them, anything we do is sleaze. Doesn't matter that we make children happy and it also doesn't matter that we love them and would never hurt them. The very fact that we are capable of loving LGs & AGs on a level of equality is completely foreign to the antis and there's no way that most of them can wrap their minds around the concept. So, as is par with human nature, we are unknown and therefore scary and therefore dangerous. I guess what I'm basically saying is, why limit our self to "pure" GMs with no romantic content (or panty content :) whatsoever when to the antis it's all the same. A loving GM and a "sleazy" GM are no different in their eyes. It's all sleaze to them, so if we're gonna worry about our public image then we should just forget that the internet exists and all go back into the trapped and lonely existance that most of us had before the net and boards like this one came along.

I do have to disagree with one thing you said though.

Furby's posts usually consist of nothing save for his desire to look up a girl's skirt, and he seems to have no interest in them as attractive people.

Please read HPNY's post below. This is untrue. Furby expresses what the majority of men feel (whether they're hetero or pedo). A hot female who's a total stranger is nice to look at and try to catch glimpses of her cute ass and, if possible, her panties. If you get to know that girl and she begins to hold some meaning for you on a personal level, then she's more than just eye candy.

That's how MEN think about WOMEN, is it not? We may be GLers, but we are still MEN (most of us). I don't understand why some people seem to have this idea that we as GLers should be taking some moral high-ground over our heterosexual counterparts in society. We're not better than them any more than they're better than us.

-BB