GirlChat #234232
Re: #2: Religion
Posted by Baldur on 2003-October-17 07:30:21 EDT, Friday
In reply to Re: #2: Religion posted by Melvin Pnmeo Scratch on 2003-October-16 23:49:22 EDT, Thursday
Views: 0 Likes: 0
Nonetheless, I believe I am justified in believing it in the absence of
any evidence to the contrary. Occam's razor - simplest solution
is probably right.
For all that, and as much as I dislike talking about "spirituality",
because most people who use that word are really talking about
taking their brains offline, I do believe that there can be ethics
without a God, based on empathy for other thinking, feeling beings.
In fact, I think ethics is one of the most important things
for humans to be involved with. I just don't want to get into
any sort of beliefs that combine fuzzy feelings with fuzzy thinking.
Baldur
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Proving a negative. - Itinerant Giggles on 2003-October-17 21:01:50 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Proving a negative. - Baldur on 2003-October-18 23:05:38 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: #2: Religion - Melvin Pnmeo Scratch on 2003-October-17 18:31:12 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)