How can she sit there talking about a "message of hate"?

I mean even if I accepted the basic premis that we're all evil, selfish child rapists, that still doesn't account for the "message of hate" thing.

I mean she's the one inciting hate of a group of people, isn't she? Even if her message of hate was somehow justified, it's intelectually dishonest to call what I say (since she "moderated" my message too) a message of hate.

I can deal with the irrational hatrid from the other side, but I demand at least a level of intelectual honesty from them. It's a minimum standard. If they can't even manage that, arguement is pointless.

Not much we can do for people like that.