I am Abraham's Naughty Boy

Actually, I have described my positions about several pedo related issues as "Atheist".

I remember our KP thread, for instance.

My position is just an Atheist positivist argument. Not even an elevated one, really, just an "if I can't see it, it doesn't exist". The burden of proof that KP is there and is all they say it is, is theirs to make, and they never make it.

I have not invented anything on this. I am only using arguments previously used for Atheism, only to show how KP is a de facto religious belief (propagated by faith, without material proof, by an ordained priesthood).

Although I would not really describe it as such, my position on inherent harm (from child sex generally or child/adult sex particularly, whichever is most adequate for the context I am in at the time) is also Atheist. It is a form of the Atheist contradictions of the apologist arguments from personal witnesses, and from majority beliefs.