Re: Reply for Dissident

Well, that is news to me, they all work in the same department do they? That is simply ridiculous. I am not privy to their workings and as I pointed out you will find desciptions of the material if you care to look and perhaps believe what they say.

But in the case of content piracy they don't just describe the content; they describe the whole of what they did; this site, this protocol, this method for searching, making the results (tadaaa) replicable - NEVER seen that for KP.

And sorry, I will just differ with you regarding any description. You believe in them (out of faith, imho); I don't (out of rational skepticism, imho). Their word without material proof is worth the same as the Bible you disbelieve in: "There was a Flood" "OK, where's the proof" "If you care to look you'll find descriptions and perhaps believe"...

I think that might be difficult since the varieties of experiences and maturity levels and combinations of such preclude such a definition but any website giving the normal development of children would suffice even if they would not conform to what you might see as "normal."

OK, but why can't I be a legitimate partner for any of that with a child in the corresponding age bracket? Why are only equally uninformed peers allowed?

Have you seen that game where you hit little things as they pop up but the little bleeders pop up somewhere else? As I said the stuff is here to stay unfortunately.

I'd love to tell Antonymous that, but they seem more determined.

Life isn't perfect or fair and it can be brutish and for some it is truly miserable.

But we have the duty of not making it yet worse.

How would one compare the life of a child prostitute who might be involved from the age of six or so until perhaps fifteen and perhaps contracting AIDs with the life of a child worker in carpet-making for example?

How about asking the child what they want?

And by the way, the carpet maker will go blind at 50, because of the effect of concentrating their eyes always on the very little and very close.

Presumably because adult are mostly finished with their development in most ways and children are not?

Well, no; the book I referred to, after researching brain chemistry during love, clearly concludes that love has "mental illness" features. So no, adults literally go insane with love. This proves that adults are not better than children with regards to evaluating a romantic relationship coldly and rationally. Whatever "finished with their development" means, it doesn't mean the ability to evaluate the love relationships one is in.

You think there is no comparison?

Yes, I think there is no comparison because I don't have any intention to hurt a child, nor does anyone on GC that I know of.

You might be content with your life

Not entirely, but it doesn't have to do with you, and it's much more than just that I can't edit with the LGF.