GirlChat #560799


Re: But .....

Posted by lee lette on 2012-August-06 10:20:42 EDT, Monday
In reply to Re: But ..... posted by Dissident on 2012-August-05 20:44:24 EDT, Sunday

  Views: 2    Likes: 0     
Sorry if I come across as a bit tetchy and I'll admit I do often get the wrong interpretation of what is posted so no offence meant to OneTwoExYou - I'll try to be more thoughtful.

Now that my sigpic is working (thank you Baldur) I'll tell you what it means to me if you haven't already guessed.

To me it encapsulates the main problem perhaps that faces all those who have problematical attractions to children - the perception by many that such people are a different species almost and typified as wanting to have sex with "our babies" even when this view is not justified. It is the more powerful because the message is voiced by a baby since much of society seems to speak for all children and portraying their views as if they are implicitly understood. As I commented in a thread with qtns2di4, how the attraction is typically presented and all the "baggage" surrounding the issues will be having an overhelming influence such that it will be difficult to overcome.


lee lette


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses
0 Responses