GirlChat #563199


Re: The Ukrainians

Posted by qtns2di4 on 2012-September-16 21:12:46 EDT, Sunday
In reply to Re: The Ukrainians posted by lee lette on 2012-September-16 16:20:29 EDT, Sunday

  Views: 2    Likes: 0     

Indicted? For what and by whom? Apparently it was not illegal for the girls to pose, there being no specific law - unless you can point to some reliable evidence (in English) - Mr.X not being one of them.

Since the shooting was not itself illegal in Ukraine (the materials are certainly illegal in the West, though), the authorities looked for accusations of sexual contact against the producers, which they would be able to charge.

like being paid to keep quiet

Unrealistic. They didn't have that much money; especially not compared with what the FBI+Europol could give them for the opposite.

threatened with violence (probably unknown in the Ukraine-NOT)

Unrealistic. The FBI+Europol would have protected them.

shame

Unrealistic. They could have quit at anytime before.

determination to move on

Good one! The problem is that we don't give Western KP children such chance. Still, not believable of 1500 possible accusers at once.

bribery and corruption

Unrealistic. Wouldn't be larger than what the FBI+Europol were devoting to shut them down.

authorities not willing to embark on such an enterprise

Yeah right, that must be why they violated their own local laws just because the USA and EU asked them to!

since such a large number were involved

I've never seen a consistent list of accused parties, but everyone knowledgeable says the agencies were about a dozen people each. Any of the Tymoshenko cases has more defendants.

and there apparently was no law in place to prevent it happening

Shooting without sex was legal, but that's why they looked for accusations of contact, which was and is illegal.

Enough?

Enough to see that you are the Creation Scientist of KP, yes.





qtns2di4


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses