What do you expect, Ethan? Like many of the pro-contacters, Dante is a hypocrite. Of course he isn't going to hold the same standards of proof for his claims as he is for those he opposes. Never mind the fact that the challenging claim (his) traditionally must have a higher standard of evidence than the reigning position does. The evidence for direct harm is well-documented; the evidence for iatrogenic/sociogenic harm is not, but the entire viability of the pro-contacter argument rests on it nonetheless.