GirlChat #703040

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

also: ''fundamentally immoral''

Posted by qtns2di4 on Monday, June 22 2015 at 03:42:03AM
In reply to Yes, you are posted by Markaba on Friday, June 19 2015 at 01:44:36AM

But just because I'm attracted to children doesn't mean I am in any way obliged to support legalizing sex with kids. I don't have to support what I feel is fundamentally immoral just because I'm a pedo.

No you don't.

But you could evaluate without allowing your morality to cloud your reasoning, whether prohibition causes more evils than it prevents or stops.

And you could also evaluate without allowing your morality to cloud your reasoning, whether, even if immoral, what other people do is any of your business or not.



I feel that a lot of things which are generally accepted today in Western societies are fundamentally immoral. I don't have to support them.

Divorce. Adultery. Some drugs (not matching US legality lists). Some animal products.

But I am rational enough to see when prohibition causes more evils than it prevents. And when what immorality people are up to is none of my business.

That is not equal to supporting it.






qtns2di4

Cuteness is to die for
Cuteness cannot fail
Cuteness knows no limit
Cuteness will prevail






Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?