Gee Whiz sadlife. You seem to have come to the conclusion that it is possible to save the lives of adults as well as children. AND that you can cite a temporary incapacity as a valid reason without blaming all those immoral advocates of sober rock climbing.

Its almost as if you are going straight to the issue of whether harm is present and what contributes to harm without leaping to the conclusion that we can decide based on demographics.

I propose that you aren't Virtuous enough.

Clearly men are designed by nature to be rock climbers, while women aren't.

And as a motherless child is more vulnerable than a fatherless one AND potential mothers are more necessary in greater numbers for the survival of the species; we can deduce that female rock climbing is an unnecessary risk.

Ethan and you just want to confuse the issue by talking about drunkenness and risk when clearly the presence or lack of a womb is the only relevant issue.

You are both less moral than me.

Dante the Anti