I don't think there are any big differences between them on issues of interest to pedophiles, 

There is. Proven record vs speculation.

And heck, we might even vote against our selfish interest if it's in the interest of the majority of the people.

I'll concede that as a fair argument. What I'm against is pedophiles who say they'll vote for Hillary because Trump will be worse for pedophiles. That does not match their past actions, sorry. Now if you're for Hillary for other, broader reasons, that's different and could be justified. (Even if I may differ from your specific politics).

Whatever the policies of the Obama administration, the credit or blame belongs with him.

As much as I'd like to blame Obama... not really.

Obama was (and I'd argue still is) a midget in foreign affairs.

That is why he relied on people who knew and still know a lot more than him: Kerry, Biden, *and* Hillary, his first Secretary of State.

I can blame Dubya for the Iraqi wing of ISIS. No problem there. But it was the State Department under Hillary which promoted the collapse of the Qaddafi regime in Libya, and the rise of armed militant groups in Syria against the Assad regime. The experience of the very recent fall of Saddam should have been enough to warn people not to overthrow regimes, even enemy or oppressive regimes (and both Qaddafi and Assad were much less inimical and oppressive than they had been at previous times), if you don't know what you're going to replace them with.

Europe had enough clout in both countries to make both regimes offer concessions to opposition without collapsing. But Europe cannot offer that if the USA wants total unconditional surrender.

Adding insult to injury, Democrats have always claimed to be the party of peace, contrasting themselves to GOP neocons like Cheney, McCain or Graham...







Cuteness is to die for
Cuteness cannot fail
Cuteness knows no limit
Cuteness will prevail