GirlChat #722450

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Different Approaches

Posted by qtns2di4 on Thursday, January 11 2018 at 1:27:16PM
In reply to Did you get 'wymyn'... posted by Dissident on Thursday, January 11 2018 at 01:33:18AM

Nope. I got it from the feminists, actually. The usage of Y is because I am a phallic symbol, but Y is obviously a symbol of the Yoni.

Well said, but you didn't mention the part where I would be expected to have sexual relations with these older women.

The reluctance to engage for those social reasons: divorced or embittered, covers the sexual part. You can't really enjoy sex with someone you can't stand in non sexual ways.

I would not want to see them naked.

Then... turn off the light. Or just take her panties down 4 inches without removing any other clothes.

Because pre-emptively cutting them off at the pass prevents those who are "on the fence" about the issue, and interested in truly open-minded research, from likewise assuming the worst along with the antis.

Why should they assume the worst?

The most important advantage of not introducing defences against the things which we are not defending, is that it makes the antis the ones fantasizing about abuse.

If I'm defending marriage, I'm defending marriage. If I'm defending contact, I'm defending contact. Whoever spoke about abuse? The one who spoke abuse is the one thinking about abuse. Not me.

have noted many times before, our audience is not simply composed of 95% antis and roughly 5% pro-choicers. There is a decent sized chunk of on-the-fencers too, and they comprise a much bigger chunk than the pro-choicers.

Wow! Then they probably should start a diet!

Yes, and imagine how it looks when there is no one to counter the position that Watson takes. It creates the impression that his cause for concern may well be warranted since it received no challenge.

It looks like trying to ban all marriage just because, um, Henry VIII killed his wives.

We don't measure humankind by its worst. Why should we, just because it involves Pedos?


Ironically, this is something Watson would see very well 99% of the time.

qtns2di4

Cuteness is to die for
Cuteness cannot fail
Cuteness knows no limit
Cuteness will prevail






Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?