Hmm...

do you feel that our use of language was appropriate, and if not, would you have any recommendations to better our use of language?

Pretty decent, iirc.

As we have learned that perhaps the use of Tor + a https website covers most of the security issues, more input on security, or what would encourage you to participate in the future, is very welcome.

Your onion required jscript.

That's a no-no. Code execution is security-undesireable. The clearweb site was fine.

t. Did you feel the age categories we chose (0-3, 4-7, 8-11, 12-14, 15-18) appropriately capture stages of development

Nah. Little shady on the low end. Try 0-3m, 4m-2y, 3-9, 10-13, etc...

...you'd have to ask someone else if the high end should be split. Usually, I figure 14-25 works fine.

You may notice that, as given, it fits into "category" (baby, kid, teen) and "boundary condition" (toddler, tween...). Yup. That's most of the structure that's been found.

Can be described pretty well with -, 0, and +, such that (0,0) implies + for the boundary condition, which is sort of the current theory.

Anyways, thanks for being here...