> I'm glad I did, since it showed how easily people inclined towards objectivity can refute the claims made by antis.

But there was absolutely no claim made in that post you responded to! Just a question that could be easily googled. (I'm still a bit annoyed that you ruined my plan lol)

> Not everyone here agrees Billi is a true blue troll as opposed to an obsessed anti. I think the jury may still be out on that one.

I think there is sufficient evidence that "billi" is a user that was banned before. Can't say who as it seems to be against the rules, but if anyone still has my private e-mail, feel free to ask.

> Eventually, we will likely grow bored of Billi's antics, stop responding, and just let her (it?) shout to the cyber-wind.

Did you notice that all the excellent points you made in your last reply were completely ignored, in favor of picking out the most inflammatory bit to seize on?

Why wait for eventually? Let's just do it and stop responding already, please.