| |
Yeah, (To Puzzled about the defenition of GL)
Posted by Fortyone on 2002-January-30 21:53:21, Wednesday
In reply to I Understand Your Point Of View, But ... posted by Puzzled on 2002-January-29 17:32:26, Tuesday
 |
|
|
|
|
I do feel pretty strongly about it. What i meant by cold and ignorant was in reference to the climate and attitudes comming into focus here on GC.. Ignorant to the fact that alot of people here also feel strongly about eliminating the bad people from the defenition of "girl love" .. But perhaps i am the ignorant one, as not one single poster has spoken up and agreed with my defenition.. I really was under the impression that a much better, more represenitive defenition was becomming understood. I'm not that big on labels either, but in a world of labels i think an accurate, more represenitive defenition/label to place on and apply to our feelings as child lovers would be extremely beneficial. To me it's as factual as death... Girl love is a whole other level above and beyond a mere sexual orientation.. It's something very different.. Very different and more involved then simply defining what age and type of person you find yourself physically attracted to, a.k.a. lust after. I thought it was pretty well known that our feelings for and attractions towards little girls went extremely far beyond the physical/sexual nature. Right? I'm sure you'd have to agree with me there, so i ask you; Why then limit the defenition to only incooperate the physical/sexual? It's like you're insulting yourself. And simply because you do not fancy "labels" doesnt mean you should ignore the world of labels that you live in and go about insulting yourself. I really, really, really do feel very strongly about this.. And your defenition and idea about the word(s) really troubles me greatly. But i totally understand what you're saying. There's clearly not an understood clear-cut universal defenition. I wish there was, and i wish it was mine (as opposed to the one you suggest).. Speaking of course of the term "girl love" here.
Now as for claiming the term girl love is derivative of the term "boy love" only makes me laugh and cry. You're saying boy love, boy lovers, the attraction of an adult to a little boy all came first? That's silly. They're wernt boy lovers around before they were girl lovers.. Just as they werent girl lovers around before boy lovers.. Yeah the online "boy love community" may have established itself first and futher, and you may be able to trace the linage of the words or provide some "facts" on the subject.. but blah blah blah- I really think you should just let this whole idea go. Neither one came first and so neither term can be derivative of the other.. Right? Heck, even if you could actually prove without a doubt that the term "boy love" was coined first i think you should let this whole idea go and agree with me that neither boy love nor girl love originated before the other and thusly it doesnt matter about who coined what first. Do you understand? I'm saying you're right, it may very well be derivative of boy love but i think that sucks, and we shouldnt dwell on it. It really does make me laugh. It doesnt matter which came first.. I know it may appear that i've contradicted myself here, but i think you get what i'm saying.. More evidence that i really dont care much for labels- but i think it is very important to distinguish girl love from pedophillia. That's all. It's not smug.. It's seperating yourself from the people who are also "sexually attracted" to little girls that would harm them etc.. Is that smug?
Thanks for replying.
41
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
