GirlChat #406326
An Open Letter in Response to a question.
Posted by Rockhard on 2007-August-29 16:20:36 EDT, WednesdayFirst, I am not a pedophile. I use Rockhard as a screen name on a lot of sites. It's one of my screen names. It's easy to remember, and it doesn't necessarly imply anything about sex.
I want to answer your questions as best I can. First, I am committed to Jack's cause, because I believe that those with a sexual preference toward children are unfairly villianized and are a part of a discrete and insular minority whose free speech rights need to be protected in order to protect the free speech rights of everyone.
Second, I do more that Social Security law. I also do employment law and consumer and borrower rights/protection. I have also handled other civil litigation. I studied constitutational law at American University and have authored a book comparing the legal approaches to and social attitudes toward pornography in different countries throughout the world.
Having said all of that, I havn't done much civil appellant work. I want to take this case, because I believe in free speech and the rights of sexual minorities. I've participated in activities that support transgender rights and radical feminists. I'm also a strong supporter of Gay and Lesbian rights. So while I havn't had a lot of experience, I'm a strong supporter of the rights of sexual minorities.
Now I can't guarentee success. Indeed, in this case, Jack may likely lose. I, however, believe that this case is a win-win situation. All I'm looking to do is to validate Jack's free speech rights. Opposing counsel will argue that this case is about unlawful conduct, not speech. I've ordered a copy of the file so I will be better able to determine if this case is about conduct rather than speech. But even if we lose, I think all parties will agree that Jack has the free speech right to discuss and advocate for his sexual orientation. This is a win for sexual minorities, because it opens the door for open discussion.
So in sum I am committed to the cause of free speech. I am a young and competent lawyer, but I will be venturing into a new area, namely appellant law. But has anyone else offered to help? Of course alot depends on Jack's willingness to cooperate with me and on the amount of resources I have available.
Finally, I could use some financial support. Appeals can be costly and time consuming. If people would like to donate to the cause, please do so.
I hope this answers your questions.
Rich
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- You need a PayPal donate link -and TRUST - J.D. (Jake#2) on 2007-August-30 15:00:54 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- The other possible meaning - slvrspun on 2007-August-29 22:46:33 EDT, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: An Open Letter in Response to a question. - Dissident on 2007-August-29 20:56:51 EDT, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- If... - Febri-chan on 2007-August-29 20:06:41 EDT, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: If... - Rockhard on 2007-August-30 20:52:15 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Since you're a mod Febri-chan - Trucker on 2007-August-30 12:26:20 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Geh!? - Febri-chan on 2007-August-30 13:31:16 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- PING: Febri-Chan - BB on 2007-August-30 21:29:25 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- By the way... - Febri-chan on 2007-August-30 13:34:26 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Geh!? - Febri-chan on 2007-August-30 13:31:16 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Freedom of speech or action? - The Phantom on 2007-August-29 17:19:16 EDT, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Freedom of speech or action? - LOD on 2007-August-30 12:19:30 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Freedom of speech or action? - Baldur on 2007-August-30 06:15:47 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Freedom of speech or action? - LOD on 2007-August-30 12:19:30 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 1)