GirlChat #326827

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: ...yours was illustrated.

Posted by jd420 on Thursday, September 29 2005 at 9:50:26PM
In reply to Re: ...yours was illustrated. posted by Lux on Thursday, September 29 2005 at 9:40:35PM

To provide a framework for an adult/child sexual relationship to work without any risk of social consequences - one must provide Many changes to reality - changes that would weigh heavy on society today, a veritable tonne of changes in that regard.

Or, she could just not tell her parents about her sex life - which is probably what she does with the part of her sex life which doesn't involve you.

As to you saying you are taken seriously in real life, realtes nothing at all to the post...

Well, it establishes that I know for a fact that you're lying out your ass with this "we aren't taken seriously" crap. I don't particularly care if you've personally met my RL friends.

My argument is that hypothetics never got anywhere in serious debate.

You have no idea what the word "debate" means, do you?

There is no comparison between someone's hatred for christianity and the outright abhorrence of adult/child sexuality in society.

You're absolutely right; non-heterosexuality never set fire to several million people.

And lastly, Love is not, nor does it need to be sex...

And yet? Good fruit does not come from evil tree, nor evil from good. If intimacy arises from an environ of mutual regard and fondness...

...well. You can read the damn book well enough to know it supports us quite well. It's only if you choose to acknowledge a faith before society that one must give freedom to the samarian, cast off the priesthood, and do unto others...

...which you may note has been lacking.

If love was sex, all parents would be incestuous.

Several are. The rest concieve out of wedlock.


jd420





Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?