Re: ...yours was illustrated.

GirlChat #326824

Posted by Lux on 2005-September-29 21:40:35 EDT, Thursday

In reply to ...yours was illustrated. posted by jd420 on 2005-September-29 21:33:14 EDT, Thursday

Views: 0 Likes: 0

To provide a framework for an adult/child sexual relationship to work without any risk of social consequences - one must provide Many changes to reality - changes that would weigh heavy on society today, a veritable tonne of changes in that regard.

As to you saying you are taken seriously in real life, realtes nothing at all to the post - I agree, but why did you reply such in the first place then?

My argument is that hypothetics never got anywhere in serious debate. Serious points get places. Hypothetical jump through hurdle answers convince no one to change their viewpoint.. a Clear road from A to B would. I don't see those posts in these debates.

There is no comparison between someone's hatred for christianity and the outright abhorrence of adult/child sexuality in society.

And lastly, Love is not, nor does it need to be (though it can be expressed via) sex. If love was sex, all parents would be incestuous.

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

Re: ...yours was illustrated. (To Lux from N) - Winston101Smith on 2005-October-01 05:27:11 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
Hypothesis - LostKari on 2005-September-30 15:00:33 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- Re: Hypothesis - Lux on 2005-October-01 18:29:25 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Hypothesis - Winston101Smith on 2005-October-01 05:32:29 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Hypothesis - Greenfly on 2005-September-30 15:10:06 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 4)
  - Yeah fire! - Winston101Smith on 2005-October-02 17:59:26 EDT, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
  - Good Point - LostKari on 2005-September-30 16:26:49 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 1)
    - So... - Winston101Smith on 2005-October-04 17:53:04 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
  - cases in point. - Greenfly on 2005-September-30 16:24:51 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
Re: ...yours was illustrated. - jd420 on 2005-September-29 21:50:26 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: ...yours was illustrated. - Lux on 2005-September-30 04:12:43 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 3)
  - Re: ...yours was illustrated. - jd420 on 2005-September-30 14:16:47 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 2)
    - Re: ...yours was illustrated. - Lux on 2005-October-01 20:11:37 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
      - hehe... - jd420 on 2005-October-03 00:50:54 EDT, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)