GirlChat #326824

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: ...yours was illustrated.

Posted by Lux on Thursday, September 29 2005 at 9:40:35PM
In reply to ...yours was illustrated. posted by jd420 on Thursday, September 29 2005 at 9:33:14PM

  • To provide a framework for an adult/child sexual relationship to work without any risk of social consequences - one must provide Many changes to reality - changes that would weigh heavy on society today, a veritable tonne of changes in that regard.

  • As to you saying you are taken seriously in real life, realtes nothing at all to the post - I agree, but why did you reply such in the first place then?

  • My argument is that hypothetics never got anywhere in serious debate. Serious points get places. Hypothetical jump through hurdle answers convince no one to change their viewpoint.. a Clear road from A to B would. I don't see those posts in these debates.

  • There is no comparison between someone's hatred for christianity and the outright abhorrence of adult/child sexuality in society.

  • And lastly, Love is not, nor does it need to be (though it can be expressed via) sex. If love was sex, all parents would be incestuous.




  • Lux





Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?