GirlChat #349012

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Fuck OFF, dude... point by point.

Posted by jd420 on Saturday, April 08 2006 at 10:05:27PM
In reply to Giving in order to be 'validated' is distasteful. posted by Piz on Saturday, April 08 2006 at 5:38:12PM

If anyone here wants to make a donation in order to try and help improve the lot of kids in poor countries, then why not use one of the charities that already exist to do just that?

A valid question - identically valid to its inverse, "why use one of the charities that already exist?"

If these charities are inadequate and somebody has an idea about a better way to do things, then they should be promoting that idea to as broad a section of donators as possible, not just a bunch of pervs on the Internet.

Truly fatal flaw #1 - requiring a myth of powerlessness as premise.

I'm afraid, good sir, that no matter how you'd like to pretend otherwise... there is only one majority, and that is diversity. It is as it is, and always has been.

Next?

Emphasising the paedoness of the money we choose to donate is fatally mixing two separate goals.

Umm... fuck you? I... really don't have anything more polite to say to anyone who has nothing more polite to say than "get back in the closet, you worthless nigger"... though I DO have much which is far less polite.

...nonetheless, if my local mall can do it, so can we. Now, fuck off.

The goal of helping kids in poor countries is a valid one, but it can’t not be tainted by being used as a showcase of our good side.

But unlike you, the rest of us don't really particularly give a fuck what some flaming troll thinks.

It’ just so transparent, and it’s going to disgust a lot of people, seeing us try to use the existence of destitute children to advance our own social standing.

Well... you're transparent, yes.

Now, let me make a few things clear :

(1) I don't have to stop doing a damned thing because your bitch ass doesn't like it.

(2) I don't have to stop doing a damned thing because anyone else doesn't like it, either?

Is that plain enough for you, or will I have to write a 500-word essay making excessive use of the word "fuck" to convey such simple points?

Remember that the game is rigged.

...only if one lets it be, which you are obviously eager to arrange.

Lots of people make donations to charity to feel good about themselves, and to show off that ‘goodness’ to others, but when we do the same thing it’s beyond the pale.

Please, let me resummarize :

(1) I don't have to stop doing a damned thing because your bitch ass doesn't like it.

(2) I don't have to stop doing a damned thing because anyone else doesn't like it, either?

...clear?

Nobody except a few of the more woolly posters on boards like these is likely going to fall for this.

That's... my personal hope for your message, yes.

Hopefully it’ll fizzle out and die quietly the same way BLcharity.net did, before it has a chance to do even more damage to our public standing.

Here's a little lesson for you :

Nothing will particularly damage our "public standing" with a hate group. This is sort of implicit in the definition of "hate group," wouldn't you think?

As desperate as you are to grab your ankles and rig the game for them, I'll reiterate the two simple points :

(1) I don't have to stop doing a damned thing because your bitch ass doesn't like it.

(2) I don't have to stop doing a damned thing because anyone else doesn't like it, either?

I have every right to use an in-network organization over an out-of-network one, I don't give a fuck what you or anyone else thinks, and I don't give a fuck about "image"...

...oh, yeah, almost forgot - you have no right whatsoever to deny me the right to operate within the networks of my choice. Period. I don't care how much you want to rig the game, you have no right to determine for me whom I can and cannot work with.

Clear?

Good. Now stop. Thanks.


jd420





Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?