GirlChat #354715
Re: Previous post in this thread should have been.
Posted by Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:30:41 EDT, Wednesday
In reply to Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. posted by Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 06:16:17 EDT, Wednesday
Views: 3 Likes: 0
It's cosmetic, and should be voluntary.. though I'd sure as hell rather have it done when I'm too young to remember it.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 09:18:04 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 7)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 19:06:18 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 19:47:25 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 20:11:03 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 22:05:47 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 23:21:16 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 22:05:47 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 20:11:03 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 19:47:25 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 3)
- It is outrageous that... - Magneto on 2006-May-24 13:31:16 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 1)
- Re: It is outrageous that... - ILGO on 2006-May-24 20:18:09 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 19:06:18 EDT, Wednesday - (3 / 0 / 4)