GirlChat #354715
Re: Previous post in this thread should have been.
Posted by Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:30:41 EDT, Wednesday
In reply to Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. posted by Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 06:16:17 EDT, Wednesday
It's cosmetic, and should be voluntary.. though I'd sure as hell rather have it done when I'm too young to remember it.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 09:18:04 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 7)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 19:06:18 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 19:47:25 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 20:11:03 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 22:05:47 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 23:21:16 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 22:05:47 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 20:11:03 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 19:47:25 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- It is outrageous that... - Magneto on 2006-May-24 13:31:16 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: It is outrageous that... - ILGO on 2006-May-24 20:18:09 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 19:06:18 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 4)