Actually, yes and no...

Because we can generate a backlash as well, by both refusing to donate further and by showing they don't really care that much about the children, given they are willing to turn ANY money away. I am sorry, but if the causes really have an importance, money has no smell, ie, wherever it comes from, it should be welcome.

So while they can suffer from one decision, they can suffer from the other decision too.

And all the while, we get the antis to show their true colours: that they are willing to kill the children just so we don't exist.

Besides, there is a decent amount of children's charities anyway. If one doesn't accept our money, then we can go to another, and another, and another - in the end there will be one for which the welfare of children will be more important than the donor's identity.

As for donating anonymously... sure, I am sure many who donated this once also donate regularly to other causes... The point is, ANYONE can donate with their identities (and orientation) known except paedophiles - why??? and why not working to correct this???