GirlChat #360607
Poppycock
Posted by Asterix on 2006-July-10 07:23:09 EDT, Monday
In reply to Re: While I generally agree... posted by Demosthenes on 2006-July-10 02:19:05 EDT, Monday
What utter twaddle!
You sound off like some Keeper of the Holy Writ not one word or comma shall be changed from the Gospel else he shall be outcast.
Im genuinely surprised by your lack of interest in wishing to promote acceptance in society. To me it is a primary concern, Im sure it must be possible. To me a tricky problem should be kicked around, looked at from all sides, taking nothing as dogma. Semantics are usually the key. Only then may glimmerings of a solution be found.
The quote above, about the 20% etc, comes from a post below regarding a tv psychologist interview (sorry I dont know how to do in-text links). I thought it looked interesting as it promotes the understanding that child-love is far more prevalent than most people think. But oh no, any discussion of it would be likely to offend the Gospel, so has to be pounced on.
I believe that we have the same ends in our sights. However whereas I would like to promote an atmosphere where there can be mutual understanding within society, you espouse your views in a way that will leave us forever as outcasts from society. I realise that you may be perfectly happy with that, but for me its not good enough.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- For the record . . . - Baldur on 2006-July-10 11:05:52 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 12)
- Should we? - Griffith on 2006-July-12 00:42:39 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Erm.. - Demosthenes on 2006-July-11 15:32:17 EDT, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: For the record . . . - Demosthenes on 2006-July-10 14:46:09 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 9)
- What is your definition of an anti? - Asterix on 2006-July-10 16:01:47 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 8)
- None so blind as those who will not see! (NT) - ILGO on 2006-July-10 16:39:34 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 7)
- Thats not answering the question [nt] - Asterix on 2006-July-10 17:36:33 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 6)
- Do read a little why don't you? It may help... - ILGO on 2006-July-10 17:41:00 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 5)
- Thats not an answer - Asterix on 2006-July-10 18:23:01 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- In this case I'd define an 'Anti' as someone... - ILGO on 2006-July-10 18:36:04 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- No - Asterix on 2006-July-10 19:00:38 EDT, Monday - (3 / 0 / 2)
- To be clear. - Infinity on 2006-July-10 19:34:46 EDT, Monday - (3 / 0 / 0)
- I made a reply here.... [NT] (Link inside) - ILGO on 2006-July-10 19:33:27 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- No - Asterix on 2006-July-10 19:00:38 EDT, Monday - (3 / 0 / 2)
- In this case I'd define an 'Anti' as someone... - ILGO on 2006-July-10 18:36:04 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- Thats not an answer - Asterix on 2006-July-10 18:23:01 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Do read a little why don't you? It may help... - ILGO on 2006-July-10 17:41:00 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 5)
- Thats not answering the question [nt] - Asterix on 2006-July-10 17:36:33 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 6)
- None so blind as those who will not see! (NT) - ILGO on 2006-July-10 16:39:34 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 7)
- What is your definition of an anti? - Asterix on 2006-July-10 16:01:47 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 8)
- Should we? - Griffith on 2006-July-12 00:42:39 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)