GirlChat #557851
Re: not really
Posted by Joey Bishop on 2012-June-15 02:17:48 EDT, Friday
In reply to not really posted by Baldur on 2012-June-14 21:42:59 EDT, Thursday
IMHO, this was a case of a justified response to a sexual assault that then went wrong, when the angry father was extra-vigilant about putting down the initial threat, to the point where the person was no longer a threat, but was still perceived as a threat or there was residual anger in the father due to protective instincts, disgust at what he had seen, and adrenaline. Police officers experience these effects when confronting suspects in an impersonal manner. I can only imagine what it's like when it's an extremely personal situation involving a father protecting a defenseless child from an attacker.
Of course, that's not to excuse either police brutality or vigilantism. As a girl lover, I am highly concerned that non violent MAPS not become a victim of either. But I do think that it does help to explain it, which is a key difference. My aim in this thread was to explain more than to excuse. I hope I was able to get that across, and if not, then I do apologize for that.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: not really - qtns2di4 on 2012-June-15 04:38:05 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)