Re: Tough chum .....

In my first post I stated that I thought the orientation was a fault in development - you chose the right moment to get the huff.

What, in your first post at GC, or your first post to me? I don't recall reading your introductory post, and if it was in the first post to me then I missed it.

It was in my first post I believe so you might have missed it.

Lost your ability to debate?

LOL, you know that's not it.

Some accuse me of doing so - sauce for the goose .....

I am sure you can choose who you want to debate with just as I can.

I see no reason to continue debating with you. It's like a black man debating with a Klu Klux Klan member, or a Jew debating with an anti-Semite. You will never listen to any of us because you see us as the problem.

I see A problem where you perhaps see NO problem and that appears to be the crux of the issue - the 'naturalness' or otherwise of the attraction, the attempts to mash together a 'theory' concerning its origins and all the associated stuff to justify one's own existence even. For me it seems and a large majority the attraction is conceived in terms of faulty development and I see very little to see it otherwise. Hence my disagreements with so many here who are trying to justify their very existence since they do perceive it as an attack to see it as a fault. Homosexuals had the same problem presumably but paedophilia is not like homosexuality in my view.

What I love is that you antis invariably attack us from the shadows. Would you have the courage to say these things to my face if you knew me and knew I was an MAP?

If you were not about to hit me in the face for anything I might say then I would be perfectly willing to meet anyone and discuss anything related to this issue. I've never been to the USA (possibly not allowed either) but get to continental Europe occsionally and other places. I would say exactly what I write here since, although you might have difficulty with this, I am essentially an honest and open person. I usually express myself as I think and feel when it is appropriate and rarely hang back.

I doubt it, because every single anti I've ever encountered on the net has been a coward. I gave you my real-life identity. Would you be willing to do the same?

Can't unfortunately since I do not trust others to not use it against me. That is life chum, since our own personal security tops most things - in my view.

There's a guy over at my other forum, the only person there who is hostile towards me. He has threatened my life repeatedly, told me to kill myself, etc.

I would never do this to anyone - I realise how the attraction affects people and how often they have little say in the matter. Snowi and I would part company over some of her comments.

Everyone there knows my identity, and I even gave him my address and told him to come do it if he has the balls. Of course, once I asked him to identify himself, he suddenly was no longer interested in debating me and gave me his equivalent of the 'Can't we all just get along?' Rodney King comment, even though he didn't mean a word of it.

The point is, I'm not wasting another second of my time debating people who are openly hostile towards me or MAPs in general, especially those whose identities I do not know. I will not tolerate your hate speech. I don't tolerate it in real-life and I won't tolerate it here.

An amicable parting then but I am NOT hostile - I am simply coming from a different place than yourself and most others and there seems little common ground between us.