We do not choose to be attracted to children, and we cannot make that attraction go away. But we can resist the temptation to abuse children sexually, and many of us present no danger to children whatsoever. Yet we are despised for having a sexual attraction that we did not choose, cannot change, and successfully resist.



Immediate presumption of universal sexual temptation, and qualified resistence. The form of words is a premade contract for therapeutic state intervention.



This hatred has its costs, both to children and to non-offending pedophiles themselves. Many pedophiles don’t seek professional help because of the shame involved in admitting to therapists that they are sexually attracted to children. Think how many cases of abuse would be avoided if pedophiles who were dedicated to resisting their attractions were treated with sympathy and respect, and were therefore more willing to seek professional help in order to remain law-abiding. And think of the cost to non-offending pedophiles themselves. Many are depressed, and even suicidal, because of sexual thoughts that they didn’t choose but are able to successfully resist.



Just to underline the points i've been making about the term paedophilia; you relentlessly use the toxic term paedophiles.



There are many who profess girllove who are neither troubled in themselves, depressed, or who present any risk. Do you accept that?

Imagine for a moment that it was your child who was unfortunate enough to be attracted to children. According to leading scientists, there is approximately a one percent chance of this happening no matter how good a parent you may be. What would you want for your child? Would you want him or her to be alone, full of self-hate, forced to bear this burden without help? Or instead, would you want your child to be treated with sympathy and respect, to have access to help so your child could live a happy, productive and law-abiding life?



And by fuck, if some refuse to take the medicine, watch thier lifes go down the plug hole. As they say, "take care!"



The goals of our organization are to reduce the stigma attached to pedophilia by letting people know that a substantial number of pedophiles do not molest children, and to provide peer support and information about available resources to help pedophiles lead happy, productive lives. Our highest priority is to help pedophiles never abuse children. We hope you will explore our web site with an open mind.



Help to lead happy productive lives..... or else obstruct anyone who comes under suspicion of ever having a 'paedophilic' thought, from ever leading a productive happy life. Sheer McCarthyism.





CONCLUSION



VP is not the answer, it's just an uncle Tom to the therapeutic state, full of guilt from the entry page. It reads like scenes from The Woodsman. Oh dear, we have these bad feelings, and we really really don't want to hurt anyone, and it's such a struggle isn't it, help help, we just want to be nice.... and deradicalised, and maybe neutered too. All your grooming needs right here courtesy of your therapeutic state, and maybe a few thousand concerned citizens thrown in to encourage it along.



I have nothing to feel guilty about and I am not ashamed of anything I feel. I have no conflict within myself or any difficulty keeping within the law, nor do I objectively fufill the criteria of paedophilia as set out in DSM. I am sure there are many who are queer and affected with girllove.



The whole premise of Virtuous Paedophiles totally skews the perception of girllove from the very outset, frankly by ignoring girllove altogether. It plays right into the hands of the established narrative in order to promote regulated intervention. The word pedophiles appears 14 times in a 600 word entry page. Dictating the issue, and the solution, despite the talky-supporty veneer.



Backdoor-pathology and mental health Self-Directed Support routes, as they currently exist, are not the answer. Let's be clear, There are NO progressive programs that currently exist anywhere. No equivalence to what NVSH did experimentally in Holland, funded by the Dutch state. VP plays into the hands of; those who want to control rather than legitimise girllove, those who want to arbitrarily identify risky individuals, and those out to dictate the condition solution and management of a perceived problem. Well let me tell you something, I think there is a place in this world for girllove, and you do not speak for who I am or what girllove means to me.



Wouldn't surprise me if the FBI and allies are behind VP. There is a lot I disagree with over what Girl Chat stands for, but Virtuous Paedophiles is disturbing. Even the name is like a Catholic confessional. I don't want to be virtuous, and i'm not a paedophile.



gl<3