The following:

>>To clarify, we do not think of GL as sick or disordered. We fully recognize that there are many MAPs who are doing quite well.

>>All of this to say that we don't make assumptions that MAPs are sick, disordered, ticking time bombs, etc.

You seem to be trying to make the case that "many MAPs...are doing quite well" in the sense that they feel good about themselves, and don't have other "mental illnesses" such as depression, etc. But as in my other post, which none of you responded to:

https://www.annabelleigh.net/messages/725185.htm

I can't believe that anyone could view underage pornography as exploitation and sexual contact with minors as abusive while not simultaneously viewing sexual attraction toward children as not an illness/sickness/disorder/etc.