GirlChat #726560
one case among many
Posted by EthanEdwards on 2018-September-04 14:13:05 EDT, Tuesday
In reply to judgment, not raw data ... posted by Baldur on 2018-September-04 13:39:14 EDT, Tuesday
Just because we have good reason to remain anonymous doesn't mean they should automatically trust us. Some journalists have gone through with interviewing me given the need for anonymity and others haven't.
BTW, up until the mid-20th century everyone knew that journalists were hacks, as disreputable as actors.
I'm sure the profession did not uniformly deserve halos. But people rightly thought a free press was very valuable. From a chorus of imperfect news outlets with stories written in part by imperfect journalists, nonetheless worthwhile things happened.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- wow... - Hajduk on 2018-September-04 19:00:14 EDT, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 4)
- don't take my word for it - EthanEdwards on 2018-September-05 10:34:03 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- Indictment of critical thought - Hajduk on 2018-September-05 23:36:12 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- The point - Baldur on 2018-September-05 11:27:13 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Heil EE! - hieronymus on 2018-September-04 19:56:59 EDT, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- don't take my word for it - EthanEdwards on 2018-September-05 10:34:03 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 2)