GirlChat #726559
judgment, not raw data ...
Posted by Baldur on 2018-September-04 13:39:14 EDT, Tuesday
In reply to you need judgment, not raw data posted by EthanEdwards on 2018-September-04 12:34:10 EDT, Tuesday
But her editor shot it down, saying that she could only do this if she could record our real identities, because anonymous sources couldn't be trusted - even knowing that our anonymity was our only defense against people like himself. Actually, probably because he knew that anonymity was our only defense against someone like himself.
So how much good is that "judgment" of our "betters"?
BTW, up until the mid-20th century everyone knew that journalists were hacks, as disreputable as actors.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- one case among many - EthanEdwards on 2018-September-04 14:13:05 EDT, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 5)
- wow... - Hajduk on 2018-September-04 19:00:14 EDT, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 4)
- don't take my word for it - EthanEdwards on 2018-September-05 10:34:03 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- Indictment of critical thought - Hajduk on 2018-September-05 23:36:12 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- The point - Baldur on 2018-September-05 11:27:13 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Heil EE! - hieronymus on 2018-September-04 19:56:59 EDT, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- don't take my word for it - EthanEdwards on 2018-September-05 10:34:03 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- wow... - Hajduk on 2018-September-04 19:00:14 EDT, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 4)