GirlChat #728185

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Overt lies?

Posted by jd420 on Wednesday, January 30 2019 at 10:06:41PM
In reply to Incorrect criminal code quotes posted by Gimwinkle on Wednesday, January 30 2019 at 10:19:10AM

the facility claimed the parent was trespassing.


Meanwhile, as mentioned, they could not have legally done so while retaining custody of the child. Who can be heard, and seen, in the video during the shooting by the way.

Kidnapping is the unlawful asportation and confinement of a person against his or her will.

...or their custodial parent or guardian's will.

The victim's arrest was lawful (see below) so a claim of kidnapping is not legally valid.


Let's look at the message you're pretending to reply to.

under the qualifying crime of unlawful child kidnapping

Are you claiming the deceased is a child? Are you trying to put forth the notion that the man sexually identifies as his own twelve year old daughter? Or are you just, you know, resorting to lies (that a 30 year old man is a twelve year old girl with legal custody of himself) because you are pushing a narrative, and know you have no recourse but overt lying?


At that time, the police and victim were approximately 6 to 8 feet from the concrete wall you mentioned.

Anyone can look at the video and see that, not only were they less than two feet from the concrete wall, but that the officer began the bashing of the man's head into the wall before uttering the magic "this will cover attempted murder" words.

At the point in time at which you choose just lying outright, there is no reason for you to pretend to be in a discussion. For all the bystanders...

...Gim is claiming this man's back foot is eight feet from that wall. That's just under three meters.

Such a claim is irrelevant, because neither felony murder nor premeditated murder can have any justification, no matter what. But you can decide for yourself if Gim lies out his ass in the red herrings, too.

I have no doubt that Gim will NOT, in fact, take a babysitting job and then trespass the parents so he can keep the kid just to test his "it wuzn't kidnapping" theory in an actual court.

Literally no possibility of legality, circumstance-independent, for either felony murder (present) or premeditated murder (for which there is probable cause). No amount of lying or whining can ever, ever change that.


Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)

Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?