| |
Proof Of Your Lies
Posted by Puzzled on 2002-January-29 17:19:25, Tuesday
In reply to Your attitude is incredible here, Puzz posted by Dissident on 2002-January-29 15:02:27, Tuesday
 |
|
|
|
|
Dissident,
posontears wrote at 18:39:11 (and I quote in full):
although i imagine what it would be like sometimes, i never couold expect a little girl to love me back. i know that when i was a little girl i wouldn't have wanted a relationship like that. Actually, i'm not even sure if i can truly consider myself to be a girllover--after all, most of my fantasies are purely physical and include hurting little girls. there is no way that can be considered girllove. I'm sure i could emotionally love anyone--after all, i love all of my friends. Is there is difference between that, minus the sexual attraction, and being in love with someone? If there is i can't see it.
No, you don't sound judgemental, just realistic. Most of us here seem very set on dreaming about what could be, and not what probably will come to us in real life.
You replied at 18:46:36:
just because you believe you would end up acting out dark fantasies in RL, does not mean that we will all end up doing so, or ever would do so.
I commented on that reply of yours at 20:30:59:
Once again, you completely misrepresent a poster's thoughts. You said, "just because you believe you would end up acting out dark fantasies in RL, does not mean that we will all end up doing so, or ever would do so." True, and she never said that we all would. In fact, she never said that ANYONE would.
Your disagreements with posts would be more menaingful if you disagreed with what the poster said rather than what you projected onto a post.
After repeated refusals to back up your assertion that she said what you falsely accused her of saying you quoted this passage of hers:
I think I was just projecting on my own personal crap. please don't be angry
But that quote was from a post that she made at 19:28:47, AFTER your accusation was made. You cannot base an accusation on a post it was not possible for you to have read at the time you made the accusation. That post had not even been written at that time, so it cannot be the basis of the accusation you made.
You are arguing like Geraldo Rivera who recently tried to cover up his lies by saying that he confused two events, one of which had not happened yet at the time of statements he had made. If your charge to poisontears has any merrit, there should be a basis for it in the post I quoted in full at the start of this post. You have never been able to do so because there is no basis for your mudslinging in her post at all.
Why can't you be honest enough to admit that?
Puzzled

|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|