"In case they prove too bashful to speak up, you should know that some regular posters here on GC are hostile to VP."

Indeed, as are posters at BC, Heretic TOC and almost everywhere else that scientifically literate Pedophiles gather. Also scientifically literate Nons such as those at Sexnet have seen through and exposed their sophistry.

Do keep in mind that if you join VP one side of a major controversy is silenced by posting policy. They refuse to allow any discussions of a world without the laws they endorse; and yet they are fine talking about the removal of laws against virtual Kiddy Pronz that they don't endorse.

Further it should be known that their origin is as two posters at B4UACT who could not accept an agnostic noncommital stance on matters where the science is unclear. They believe that warranted agnosticism is tantamount to endorsement of whatever they're against. And routinely slur the motives of those who argue against them. This opening salvo of theirs they do not deem to be "hostile," only the responses which question the morality of unwarranted defamatory attacks.

Some posters here have left in disgust over their POV. At least one such person has found a refuge at GC.

OTOH, aside from a few limits to keep ourselves online, GC will continue to be the place that Ethan comes to debate both sides of a controversial topic which the science is working through at present. GC does not require you to take a side or be removed. But since so many other places on the Internet allow the prevailing myths to dictate what is permitted, by and large those who wish to support the status quo find homes elsewhere leaving GirlChat's posters to cluster around something other than the heterodoxy.

Be muzzled their or free here. Either way the VP perspective will be represented at GC for the forseeable future along with posts which allow critique of it.

Dante