GirlChat #354694
Previous post in this thread should have been...
Posted by ILGO on 2006-May-24 05:24:50 EDT, Wednesday
In reply to Re: Now here's an interesting topic.. posted by Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 02:36:24 EDT, Wednesday
Still, I wonder how strong of a case could be made for this type of hormonal therapy under the guise of 'life extending benefits' I mean as a society we have done worse! Look at circumcision (which I do NOT agree with) which is even now still excused as a cancer prevention method! Or as I said before, vacinations...
[does some googling]
On second thought nevermind. The history of various other 'cures' makes it quite clear that as long as children are considered property it will be all too easy to force this kind of hormonal therapy on them "for their own good" and the children will be powerless against it as they have with so many things before.
The case can and will be made, it shouldn't be an act of force.
--I*Love*Green*Olives
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:24:29 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 06:16:17 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 11)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:30:41 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 8)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 09:18:04 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 7)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 19:06:18 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 19:47:25 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 20:11:03 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 22:05:47 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 23:21:16 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 22:05:47 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 20:11:03 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 19:47:25 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- It is outrageous that... - Magneto on 2006-May-24 13:31:16 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: It is outrageous that... - ILGO on 2006-May-24 20:18:09 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 19:06:18 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 09:18:04 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 7)
- It is! It is!! - jd420 on 2006-May-24 07:08:55 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: It is! It is!! - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 08:59:39 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:30:41 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 8)